Interview Scorecard Template: Free Rubric With Anchors
Five criteria, one anchored scale, one line of evidence behind every score. A person decides.
In this article
An interview scorecard template needs five things: job-related criteria, the question you asked, a rating scale with written anchors, an evidence column for what the candidate said or did, and a decision signed by a named person. Copy the free template below into Word, Excel or Google Docs. It works on paper, with no tool.
A person fills in this card, from evidence, and a person decides. We make an AI notetaker, and further down we say what ours does with interviews, including the part we would not rely on. You do not need it to use this template.
The interview scorecard template
Fill in one card per candidate, per interviewer, per round. Select the table, copy it and paste it into Word, Google Docs, Excel or Sheets. Write the criteria and the questions before the first interview, then leave them alone until the role closes. At the top of the card, add the candidate, role, round, interviewer, date and the time you finished scoring.
| Criterion | Weight | Question asked | Evidence: what they said or did | Score (1-5 or N/A) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. [Skill the job needs] | [1-3] | [The same question for every candidate] | [Quote or specific example: their part, the result] | [ ] |
| 2. [Skill the job needs] | [1-3] | [Question] | [Evidence] | [ ] |
| 3. [Skill the job needs] | [1-3] | [Question] | [Evidence] | [ ] |
| 4. [Skill the job needs] | [1-3] | [Question] | [Evidence] | [ ] |
| 5. [Skill the job needs] | [1-3] | [Question] | [Evidence] | [ ] |
| Weighted score | [Strongest evidence and biggest gap, one line each] | [Average] | ||
| Interviewer view | [Advance, do not advance, or not enough evidence, and the criterion behind it] |
Rating anchors: what each score means
A 1-5 scale with no definitions lets each interviewer use a private scale. Anchors fix that. The US Office of Personnel Management describes highly structured interviews as scored against benchmarks of proficiency, and links more structure to better validity and reliability. Start with these generic anchors.
| Score | Meaning | What the evidence looks like |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Well above the bar | A specific, recent example at a bigger scope than this role needs. Their own actions and the result are clear, and they say what they would change. |
| 4 | Above the bar | A specific example at the scope of this role, with their own actions and the result clear, plus one extra: a number, a trade-off they weighed, or the same result twice. |
| 3 | Meets the bar | A specific example at the scope of this role. Their own actions and the result are clear. |
| 2 | Below the bar | The example stays general, the credit goes to "we", or the result is missing even after a follow-up question. |
| 1 | No evidence, or evidence against | No example after a follow-up question, or the example shows the opposite of what the job needs. |
| N/A | Not assessed | Not asked, or you ran out of time. Leave it out of the average. |
Then write job-specific anchors for your two or three most important criteria. Describe a 1, a 3 and a 5 in behavior you could hear in an answer. Here is what that looks like for a customer support lead, an invented example.
| Criterion | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Handling an escalation | Cannot name a real escalation, or handed it off and stopped there. | Names one escalation, what they did first and how it ended. | Names one escalation, what they did first, how it ended and what they changed so it would not happen again. |
| Coaching a teammate | Talks about coaching in general, with no person or situation. | One real case: what the problem was and what they did about it. | One real case, what changed in the teammate's work afterward and how they checked. |
| Prioritizing | Says everything is urgent, or gives only a general rule. | One busy week: what they did first, and why. | One busy week: what they did first, what they dropped, and who they told. |
A filled-in example
The same role, one interviewer, one round. The candidate and the answers are invented.
| Criterion | Weight | Question asked | Evidence: what they said or did | Score (1-5 or N/A) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Handling an escalation | 3 | Tell me about the hardest customer escalation you owned. What did you do first? | Refund dispute on a 40-seat account. Called within the hour, gave a date, wrote a macro afterward so the team could handle the next one. No figures on the result. | 4 |
| Coaching a teammate | 2 | Tell me about a teammate whose work you helped improve. | Paired with a new agent on three tickets a day for two weeks. "Their reopens went down." Did not say how they checked. | 3 |
| Prioritizing | 2 | Walk me through your busiest week last quarter. | Talked about a launch week in general terms and said they triage by severity. Could not say what came first, even after a follow-up question. | 2 |
| Reporting to leadership | 1 | Not asked in this round. | Not covered. Owner: next interviewer. | N/A |
| Interviewer view | Advance. Strong on escalations. Prioritizing needs a probe in the next round. | 3.1 |
Six rules that keep the card honest
- Take the criteria from the job, not from a list of traits. Four to six is plenty for one interview (our rule of thumb, not a study).
- Ask every candidate the same questions. In the most structured format OPM describes, all applicants get the same lead questions and the same follow-up probes.
- Write evidence during the interview, in their words where you can. Score right after it, before you talk to anyone on the panel.
- Keep what the job does not need off the card: age, family, health, origin, religion and the like.
- Drop an undefined "culture fit" row, because it collects impressions. If a value matters for the job, write it as a behavior you can ask about, such as raising a problem early.
- Rate alone, then compare. OPM describes panels where each member rates individually and the group then resolves large gaps.
Which criteria go in which round
Give each criterion one owner, so two interviewers do not ask the same question and nobody skips the hard one.
| Round | Score here | Leave for later |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiter screen | Two or three must-have requirements, and why this role | Deep skill checks |
| Hiring manager | Core skills and past results at this scope | Anything a work sample will show better |
| Work sample or technical | The skill itself, on the same exercise for everyone | Motivation and career history |
| Panel or final | Criteria nobody has covered yet | Rescoring a criterion with no new evidence |
The panel debrief sheet
Collect every card before the meeting, then start with the biggest gaps, not the average. Someone who scored a 2 and someone who scored a 4 heard different things, and the evidence column shows what.
| Criterion | Interviewer A | Interviewer B | Interviewer C | Discuss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Handling an escalation | 4 | 5 | 4 | No, the reads agree |
| Coaching a teammate | 3 | N/A | 2 | Which example did each of you hear? |
| Prioritizing | 2 | 4 | N/A | Yes, read both evidence lines aloud |
| Reporting to leadership | N/A | N/A | 3 | Only one read so far |
End the sheet with four lines: the decision, who decided, the reason in terms of the criteria, and the date. A named person signs it. The average is one input to that decision, not the decision.
Word, Excel or Google Docs
| Format | Use it for | How |
|---|---|---|
| Word or Google Docs | One card per interviewer, on screen or printed | Paste the table, switch the page to landscape and widen the Evidence column. |
| Excel or Google Sheets | Weighted scores and the panel sheet | Paste the table at cell A1, so Weight lands in column B and Score in column E, then add the formula below. |
| Paper | Interviews in a room with no laptop | Print one card per round and score right after the interview. |
| Your ATS | Teams that already keep scorecards there | If it has a scorecard feature, copy these criteria and anchors into it. |
If you record the interview
A recording helps with one column: evidence. You stop quoting from memory and check the words instead. It also adds duties, so it is optional.
A recorder with no bot shows the candidate nothing, so a written notice before the interview is your job. Several US states, California among them, require every party to agree before a call is recorded, and in the EU you need a lawful basis under the GDPR and should say why you record. Rules differ by country and state, so check the rules where everyone on the call is.
Here is how Reline fits. It captures your microphone and the computer's audio locally on Mac, Windows, Linux (beta) or in the browser, and no bot joins. Transcription, AI and storage run in the cloud. The recording is kept, so you can press play on any transcript line before you paste a quote into the Evidence column. Summaries cite nothing, so check them against the transcript. Chat answers can cite a note or a moment.
- Speakers: labels are Me vs Other, plus beta voice numbering you name yourself. Names are not automatic. In a room, everyone arrives through one microphone, so check who spoke before you quote.
- ATS: no connector to any ATS. You paste the card in by hand.
- Retention: no auto-delete schedule, so your retention period is a rule your team follows. Delete permanently in the trash removes the note, its recordings and its transcript at once. Anything left in the trash is purged at 30 days.
- Access: notes are private by default, and a workspace role alone grants nothing.
- Paperwork: a DPA is available. There is no SOC 2 report and no BAA.
- Price: $15 per seat a month. Free is 10 hours of transcription and 1 hour per recording.
Can AI fill in an interview scorecard?
It can draft one, but we would not let it score for you. AI can help you find what was said. A person should set each score, and a person must make the decision. A score or a recommendation also draws more legal attention than a plain transcript, which is where these rules come in.
| Rule | What it covers | What it means for a scorecard |
|---|---|---|
| NYC Local Law 144 | Tools that use machine learning, analytics or AI, help make hiring or promotion decisions, and substantially assist or replace discretionary decision-making. The city's rules count relying only on a score, tag or ranking, weighting it above every other criterion, or using it to overrule people. | The rules exclude plain transcription and give scores and recommendations as examples of covered output. Where the law applies: a bias audit in the past year, a published summary of it, and notice to NYC-resident candidates 10 business days before use. |
| Illinois AI Video Interview Act (820 ILCS 42) | Employers that ask applicants to record video interviews and use AI to analyze them, for positions based in Illinois. | Before asking for the video: tell the applicant, explain how the AI works and what it evaluates, and get consent. By its wording it targets applicant videos, not audio notes from a live call. Separately, the Illinois Human Rights Act (HB 3773) has required notice since January 1, 2026 when AI is used in hiring decisions, video or not. The state withdrew its proposed notice rules in June 2026, so check the current position. |
| EU AI Act, Annex III point 4(a) | Lists as high-risk the AI systems intended for recruitment or selection, including to analyze and filter applications and to evaluate candidates. | Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 moved the high-risk duties for these systems from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027. Whether a tool that only transcribes and takes notes falls inside is unsettled. One that scores candidates sits closer (our reading). |
What our Candidate Scorecard Lens does
Stated plainly: when you run it on a recorded interview, the Lens reads the transcript and drafts a score from 1 to 5 on six fixed dimensions, one of them Culture Fit, with an evidence line for each. It adds a total out of 30, strengths, concerns and a hiring recommendation from Strong Yes to Strong No. It is told to score only what was discussed and to mark the rest N/A.
That output is a draft from an AI model, and a person must decide. We would not copy its numbers into your card or treat its recommendation as a hiring signal. If you only want help with the Evidence column, choose "Add to my workspace" on the Lens, which makes your own copy, and edit that copy: remove the scores, the Culture Fit row, the total and the recommendation, and list your own criteria. Then press play on the line behind each quote and score it yourself.
The template is yours either way. If you want the exact words in front of you when you fill in the Evidence column, tell the candidate first, then record.
Common questions
- What should an interview scorecard include?
- Job-related criteria set before the first interview, the question asked for each, a rating scale with written anchors, a line of evidence behind every score, the interviewer's view, and a final decision signed by a named person. Leave out anything the job does not need, such as age, family, health or origin, and undefined labels like "culture fit".
- What rating scale should an interview scorecard use?
- 1 to 5 is the most familiar, with N/A for anything not assessed. The number of points matters less than written anchors that make a 3 mean the same thing to every interviewer. A 1 to 4 scale also works and removes the middle option. Pick one and keep it for every candidate in the role.
- Is there a free interview scorecard template for Word or Excel?
- Yes. The template on this page is free and needs no download or sign-up: copy the table into Word, Google Docs, Excel or Sheets. For a weighted score in Excel, use =SUMPRODUCT(B2:B6,E2:E6)/SUMIF(E2:E6,">0",B2:B6), which leaves N/A rows out.
- What is the difference between an interview scorecard and an evaluation form?
- The words overlap. An evaluation form is often a general rating filled in after the interview. A scorecard sets the criteria, questions and anchors in advance and ties each score to evidence, so candidates for one role are compared on the same terms. If your evaluation form does those things, it is a scorecard.
- Can AI fill in an interview scorecard?
- It can draft one, but a person should score and a person must decide. AI scores and recommendations can fall under rules such as NYC Local Law 144, depending on how you use them, and the EU AI Act lists AI for evaluating candidates as high-risk. Reline's Candidate Scorecard Lens drafts scores and a recommendation: treat them as a draft and ask counsel.
- Should culture fit be on an interview scorecard?
- Not as an undefined row, because it tends to collect impressions that no evidence backs up. If a value matters for the job, write it as a behavior you can ask about, such as how the candidate raised a problem early, add anchors, and score it like any other criterion.
Related posts

Interview Notes: What to Write Down (and What Never To)
What to write in interview notes: observable behavior, actual answers, and live competency scores. Plus what to leave out and how to keep notes private.

What to Tell US Candidates Before Using an AI Notetaker
Before an AI notetaker records a US interview: all-party consent states, Illinois AI and biometric laws, NYC Local Law 144, EEOC duties, and a notice script.

Granola vs Otter vs Fathom for Job Interviews (2026)
Granola, Otter and Fathom for job interviews, next to Metaview, BrightHire and Reline: bot or no bot, candidate consent, scorecards, ATS hand-off and retention.
Stop taking notes.Start shipping outcomes.
Free forever for individuals. Five minutes to install. Your next meeting writes its own notes.