Granola vs Otter vs Fathom for Job Interviews (2026)
An interview is not a sales call. Here is how six notetakers handle the parts that only hiring has: consent, scorecards, bias and the ATS.
In this article
- What does an interview need that a normal meeting does not?
- How do the six tools compare for interviews?
- Should a bot join a candidate call?
- Granola for interviews
- Otter for interviews
- Fathom for interviews
- Metaview and BrightHire: built for hiring teams
- Scorecards and bias: keep the AI out of the decision
- Retention: decide before the first interview
- What if you are the candidate?
- Where Reline fits, and where it does not
For job interviews, Granola is the quietest option: no bot joins, but its desktop app keeps no audio to replay. Otter and Fathom send a visible bot by default, with no interview scorecards. Metaview and BrightHire are built for hiring and write scorecards into your ATS. Either way, tell the candidate first and keep the AI out of the decision.
What does an interview need that a normal meeting does not?
Most notetaker comparisons are written for sales calls and stand-ups. A candidate call adds six requirements that a generic review never checks:
- Notice and consent before anything records, from a person who may feel unable to say no.
- A calm call. A bot tile labelled “Notetaker” changes the room for a nervous candidate, but it also makes the recording obvious.
- Evidence for the scorecard: what the candidate actually said, ideally something you can replay before you quote it.
- A clear hand-off into the ATS, so notes do not live in a personal app forever.
- A retention rule, because interview data should not outlive its purpose.
- AI that drafts notes but does not rank, score or recommend on its own.
If you want the general Granola, Otter and Fathom comparison (pricing, editors, CRM pushes), read our three-way comparison. This page only covers the hiring angle.
How do the six tools compare for interviews?
| Granola | Otter | Fathom | Metaview | BrightHire | Reline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How it captures | Bot-free, device audio (desktop and mobile apps) | Bot (OtterPilot) by default | Bot by default; bot-free beta on Mac only | Named bot on calls; bot-free desktop app for Mac and Windows; phone screens | Joins as a participant; native Zoom app; phone calls | Bot-free, local capture on Mac, Windows and Linux (beta) |
| What the candidate sees | Nothing, unless you turn on its chat message and camera watermark | A bot in the participant list | A bot, unless you use the Mac beta | A clearly named participant (on calls) | A participant with a “Recording” label and a chat message (Meet, Teams); a day-before email with opt-out if enabled | Nothing; the notice is your job |
| Audio to replay | No: the desktop app does not store audio | Yes | Yes (bot-free “transcript only” keeps none) | Yes | Yes | Yes, with a play button on every transcript line |
| Interview scorecards | Not a hiring feature; templates only | Not mentioned on its Recruiting Agent page | Not offered | Notes and scorecards go to the candidate record | One-click scorecards into the ATS | Candidate Scorecard Lens (drafts scores; you edit it) |
| ATS hand-off | No ATS on its integrations page | Recruiting Agent syncs to Greenhouse “and other ATS systems” | No ATS on its pricing page | Integrates with a wide range of ATSs incl. Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby | Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workday, Rippling, BambooHR, Gem | No ATS integration (Slack, Linear, Notion only) |
| Retention controls | Per-user transcript retention; org-wide auto-delete on Enterprise | “Custom data retention” on its pricing page; plan not stated | Custom data retention policies on Enterprise | Not stated on its pages | Customizable data retention | No schedule; manual delete, trash purged after 30 days |
| Price to start | Free (30 days of history); Business $14/user/mo | Free: 300 min/mo, 30 min per conversation; Business $19.99/user/mo annual | Free: unlimited recordings; Premium $20/mo ($16 annual) | Notetaker price not public | No public price; demo only | Free: 10 h/mo, 1 h per note; Professional $15/user/mo ($12 annual) |
Should a bot join a candidate call?
There is a real trade-off, and neither side is wrong. A visible bot does part of the notice work: BrightHire’s Meet and Teams notetaker shows a “Recording” label and posts a chat message to everyone, and Metaview appears as a clearly named participant that the host admits and can remove. The cost is an extra face in a call where the candidate is already under pressure.
A bot-free tool keeps the call to two people, but then nothing in the call tells the candidate they are being recorded. Granola offers an optional automated chat message and a camera watermark for that reason. With Reline, or with Granola’s message turned off, the notice is entirely on you. Recording laws are about recording people, not about how the audio is captured, so a bot-free tool needs a written notice and a spoken consent question more, not less.
Granola for interviews
Granola works well for an interviewer who types rough notes during the call and wants them cleaned up afterwards, with no bot in the room. Its consent feature (a chat message and a camera watermark, when enabled) is a thoughtful touch for hiring. Two limits matter here. Granola’s docs say the desktop app does not store meeting audio, so when a panel disagrees about what a candidate said, there is no recording to settle it. And its integrations page lists no ATS, so notes reach Greenhouse or Lever by copy and paste or through Zapier. Enterprise ($35/user/month) adds org-wide auto-deletion, which is useful for a hiring retention rule.
Otter for interviews
Otter’s Recruiting Agent page says it captures interviews, generates candidate insights and syncs to Greenhouse and other ATS systems, but the page does not say which plan includes it. Watch the free tier: Basic caps each conversation at 30 minutes, which cuts off most interviews, and Pro caps it at 90 minutes. Business ($19.99/user/month annual, $30 monthly) allows up to 4 hours. OtterPilot joins as a bot by default. For hiring teams, also read Otter’s privacy policy (effective 16 June 2026): it trains Otter’s own AI on de-identified audio recordings and transcriptions, which may contain personal information. That belongs in your candidate notice.
Fathom for interviews
Fathom’s free plan records without limits, which makes it tempting for a startup running its first hiring loop. It was not built for hiring, though: its pricing page names HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Zapier and Make, and no ATS or scorecard feature. It joins as a bot by default. Its bot-free modes live in Fathom 3.0, which its help center says is only available on Mac, with Windows bot-free recording in a limited Microsoft Teams alpha. If you use the bot-free “transcript only” mode, no recording is kept.
Metaview and BrightHire: built for hiring teams
If you run structured interviews at volume, these two do the job the general tools do not. Both write notes and scorecards into the candidate’s ATS record, and both handle phone screens. Metaview joins calls as a named participant, also has a desktop app for Mac and Windows that records without a bot, and lists integrations with a wide range of ATSs, including Greenhouse, Lever and Ashby. Its support site says its notes do not make hiring decisions or recommendations. BrightHire, which Zoom acquired in 2025, runs as a native Zoom app, can email candidates the day before their first interview with an opt-out link, and offers customizable retention. Neither publishes a notetaker price, and both are sales-led.
One caution: BrightHire also sells an AI interviewer that scores screens against a rubric. Once software scores or ranks candidates, rules like New York City’s Local Law 144 can apply. Our candidate notice guide covers that.
Scorecards and bias: keep the AI out of the decision
The highest risk in interview notetaking is not the transcript. It is the AI score or summary that quietly becomes the decision. A few rules hold whichever tool you use:
- Each interviewer writes their own score before the debrief and before reading anyone else’s, or the AI’s.
- Treat any AI-drafted score or hire/no-hire line as a draft a person reviews, never as the outcome.
- Remove vague criteria such as “culture fit” from AI templates. They invite impressions, not evidence.
- Check the audio before you quote a candidate. Transcription is good, not perfect, and errors are more likely with accents, crosstalk and technical terms.
- Never record or summarize protected characteristics. Your notes should describe what was said, not who the candidate seems to be.
Retention: decide before the first interview
Interview recordings are personal data with a short useful life. Decide how long you keep recordings, transcripts and scorecards before the first interview, and write it into your notice. Granola Enterprise and BrightHire offer automatic retention; most tools leave it to an admin setting or to you. No tool we checked deletes when a role is filled, so use that date as a manual trigger.
What if you are the candidate?
Some people asking this question are job seekers who want a record of their own interview. Every rule above applies to you too: ask the interviewer at the start whether they mind, and stop if they say no. A bot joining an employer’s call is a poor first impression, so a bot-free tool is the better fit, used with permission and only for your own notes.
Where Reline fits, and where it does not
Reline is our product, so read this as a vendor stating its case. Reline captures your microphone and computer audio locally on Mac, Windows or Linux (beta), so no bot joins the interview. Capture is the only local step: transcription, AI notes and storage run in our cloud, and your candidate notice should say so. The recording stays with the note, so you can press play on any transcript line before you quote a candidate. Speakers are separated by audio source (you vs the other side), not by a saved voiceprint. Notes are private by default: a workspace role alone grants no access, so candidate notes stay with the people you add.
The Candidate Scorecard Lens drafts a 1 to 5 score per dimension with evidence and marks anything not discussed as N/A. It also drafts a hiring recommendation and includes a “culture fit” row, so we suggest copying the Lens, removing both, and treating the output as a draft. Free covers 10 hours of transcription a month, up to 1 hour per note; Professional is $15/user/month ($12 annual).
Reline is the wrong pick for interviews when:
- You need scorecards written into Greenhouse, Lever or Ashby automatically. Reline has no ATS integration; Metaview and BrightHire do.
- You want the tool to send the candidate notice or opt-out for you. BrightHire can; Reline does not.
- You need an automatic deletion schedule. Reline has none; deletion is manual, and the trash is purged after 30 days.
- Your security review requires SOC 2. Reline does not hold the certificate today; Metaview and BrightHire list SOC 2 Type II.
Common questions
- How does Granola compare to Otter and Fathom for recording job interviews?
- Granola joins no call and its desktop app keeps no audio, so the call stays calm but there is nothing to replay. Otter and Fathom join as a bot by default and keep the recording. None of the three offers interview scorecards; only Otter’s Recruiting Agent mentions an ATS (Greenhouse). Recruiting tools such as Metaview and BrightHire cover scorecards and ATS hand-off.
- Is it legal to record a job interview with an AI notetaker?
- Usually yes with notice and consent, but the rules depend on where the candidate and interviewer are: some US states require every party to agree, and Illinois and New York City add rules for AI in hiring. Tell the candidate in writing, ask again at the start of the call, and have counsel review your notice. This is not legal advice.
- Should the notetaker join the interview as a bot?
- A visible bot makes the recording obvious, which helps with notice, but adds a stranger to a stressful call. A bot-free tool keeps the call private to the two of you, which means you must give the notice yourself, in writing and out loud.
- Which AI notetaker writes scorecards into Greenhouse or Lever?
- Recruiting-specific tools do: Metaview writes notes and scorecards back to the candidate’s ATS record, and BrightHire sends scorecards to Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workday and others in one click. Otter’s Recruiting Agent syncs to Greenhouse. Granola, Fathom and Reline have no ATS integration.
- Can AI interview notes introduce bias?
- Yes, mainly through AI scores, rankings and vague criteria like “culture fit”. Have each interviewer score independently first, treat AI output as a draft, check the audio before quoting, and never note protected characteristics. If software scores or ranks candidates, laws like NYC Local Law 144 can apply.
Related posts

What to Tell US Candidates Before Using an AI Notetaker
Before an AI notetaker records a US interview: all-party consent states, Illinois AI and biometric laws, NYC Local Law 144, EEOC duties, and a notice script.

Interview Notes: What to Write Down (and What Never To)
What to write in interview notes: observable behavior, actual answers, and live competency scores. Plus what to leave out and how to keep notes private.

Can an AI notetaker auto-delete interview transcripts?
Which AI notetakers auto-delete transcripts on a schedule, what GDPR and US hiring rules make you keep, and how to delete by hand when a role is filled.
Stop taking notes.Start shipping outcomes.
Free forever for individuals. Five minutes to install. Your next meeting writes its own notes.